SIMPLY CATHOLIC

Living a Catholic Life in the Modern World

More on Confession

March 14, 2008

There has been a lot in the news the past week and even more in blogs written about confession, both the Sacrament and the basic concept.  In the news there have been two stories which have caught my eye.  The first was that horrible misreporting of the Vatican announcing new, more culturally relevant sins and the second was a report on the trend to confess sins online.  The Catholic Blog world has been much more rich with a variety of articles being written about Confession, first confession, the practice of the Sacrament, the renewed interest so many people are having with the act of just going in reciting  sins and receiving absolution.  

 Now as most Catholics have picked up by now the main-stream news media is horribly out of touch when it comes to reporting on anything having to do with the Catholic Church.  When it is the British Press just triple that.  Amy Welbourn and Deacon Kandra   had insightful things to say about this crossing of bad reporting and the secular media’s natural inclination to get fuzzy headed, silly, giddy any time they think they found something interesting to say about the Catholic faith.  Dullards. 

 Almost as stupid is the CNN.com report on online “confession”.   I wish I could say I was surprised that a national news source reported on the trend of “true confession” sites with such a religious sounding angle but at the same time showed little respect or understanding of the significance of confession in religion.  It isn’t shocking simply because the press so often gets religion wrong.  At least in this article they bother to actually talk to religious leaders about the sacrament vrs the online confession fad.

Around the blogs I read there has been a trend of some very fine writing about Confession in the Sacramental sense.  Julie at Happy Catholic has a wonderful post and round-up of some of the best of these articles.  I really encourage everyone to read them. 

Pope denounces endless spiral of destruction and death in Israel

Pope Benedict XVI waves to pilgrims during in Vatican for his weekly general audience on February 2008. The Pope denounced the “endless spiral of death and destruction” in Israel, and urged Israelis and Palestinian authorities to continue to negotiate “to build a peaceful future.” (AFP Vincenzo Pinto)

 Pope Benedict XVI waves to pilgrims during in Vatican for his weekly general audience on February 2008. The Pope denounced the “endless spiral of death and destruction” in Israel, and urged Israelis and Palestinian authorities to continue to negotiate “to build a peaceful future.” (AFP Vincenzo Pinto) VATICAN CITY (AFP) Pope Benedict XVI on Sunday denounced the “endless spiral of death and destruction” in Israel, and urged Israelis and Palestinian authorities to continue to negotiate “to build a peaceful future.” “In recent days violence and horror has again bloodied the Holy Land, feeding an endless spiral of destruction and death,” he told thousands of pilgrims in St. Peter’s square for his weekly angelus. His call came after a Palestinian gunman shot dead eight students, mostly teenagers, at a Jewish theological school this week in the deadliest such attack in Jerusalem since February 2004. “I encourage Israel and Palestinian authorities in their intention to continue, through negotiation, to build a peaceful and just future for their people,” he added. Benedict called on “all in the name of God to leave the tortuous ways of hate and vengeance to take, in a responsible way, the paths of dialogue and confidence.” The pontiff indicated that he wanted “the same for Iraq.” He renewed his appeal for the release of the Chaldean Catholic archbishop of Iraq’s northern city of Mosul, Faraj-Farraj Rahhu, who was kidnapped on February 29, and said his thoughts were with “the large number of Iraqis who continue to suffer blind, absurd violence.”

© 2008 Agence France-Presse

 

Vatican acknowledges abuse of women religious by priests

NCR Staff

The Vatican has acknowledged the sexual abuse of women religious by priests in a declaration posted March 20 on the Vatican website by spokesman Joaquín Navarro-Valls.

The problem to which the declaration refers was the subject of an extensive report in the March 16 issue of NCR. That story and the documentation upon which it was based are also available on this website.

The Vatican statement reads:

In relation to the news of cases of sexual abuse of women religious on the part of priests or missionaries, the director of the Sala Stampa of the Holy See, Dr. Joaquin Navarro-Valls, has released this morning the following declaration:

“The problem is known, and is restricted to a geographically limited area.The Holy See is dealing with the question in collaboration with the bishops, with the Union of Superiors General (USG) and with the International Union of Superiors General (USIG). The work has two sides, the formation of persons and the solution of single cases.

Certain negative situations cannot cause to be forgotten the frequently heroic fidelity of the great majority of male religious, female religious and priests.”

The statement, in Italian, is on the Vatican website at www.vatican.va The above is a translation by NCR.The statement did not specify what geographic area is involved nor what was being done to deal with the problem.

Further details on the issue will appear in the March 30 issue of NCR.

The declaration was issued following publication of a long report – based on NCR’s March 16 cover story – in the March 20 issue of La Repubblica, Italy’s largest-circulation daily. The piece was written by leading Vaticanologist Marco Politi.

National Catholic Reporter, March 20, 2001

Abdullah Badawi said yesterday: “Judge BN by its track record”

Media Release by Wee Choo Keong, PKR candidate for P116 Wangsa Maju


In the 2004 General Elections (GE) campaign, Datuk Seri Abdullah Badawi (Badawi) had pledged that fighting corruption was his first priority if he were to win the GE. The nation gave him a landslide victory.

Fighting Corruption

Soon after Badawi took office of the Prime Minister (PM), after Kasitah Adam was charged for corruption involving RM3.5 million, Badawi announced that it was one down and there were 18 more big “sharks” to go. The nation backed Badawi all the way with his call to fight corruption.

Four years passed by, and while Badawi was still having his “honeymoon,” most of these 18 big “sharks” were still swimming in Parliament until it was dissolved on 24-02-08. Malaysians laughed at the bribery charge of RM3.5 million against a minister as in the case of Kasitah Adam because it is an open secret that bribery at high places involves a few hundred million Ringgit.

How can one fight against corruption when the Anti-Corruption Agency (ACA) itself is corrupt. During the Royal Commission of Inquiry, Dato V K Lingam’s secretary, Ms Jeyanthi, said that an ACA officer had told her that the ACA had to close the investigation because the case involved powerful people in the BN administration and she was paid RM3,000-00 to keep ‘quiet.’ If the ACA was also involved in such corrupt activities, then Badawi’s record for fighting corruption was just another misleading and meaningless public statement that he had been known to make.

In fact, it is an open secret in Malaysian society that BN has inculcated a culture that generally if the rakyat want to get things done fast then they had to pay bribes for quick delivery. When one is stopped by the traffic police, one is expected to pay bribes otherwise one will be issued with a summons and face inconveniences. CORRUPTION HAS BECOME A WAY OF LIFE UNDER THE BADAWI’S ADMINISTRATION. IT HAS GONE FROM BAD TO WORST.

Launching of National Plans

Badawi had launched the 9th Malaysian Plan some two years ago with massive publicities in our controlled mass media. Until this very day, there has been no public debate on the 9th Malaysian Plan nor has it been put into action. It was a total failure for Badawi, as the ex-PM, for treating the 9th Malaysian Plan, a serious national agenda, as a joke and another of his publicity stunt.

I call upon Badawi to produce his record on fighting corruption since 2004 and how many of the plans and/or projects that he had announced had been implemented.

What, the BN party are bankrupt of political ideas and now resorting to more lies?

The Barang Naik party know their days are coming to an end. They know they have nothing concrete to show to the rakyat after 50 years of independence. They know the rakyat have no more ears to listen to their LIES and BULLSHITS.

So what do this Barang Naik party, especially their partner-in-crime MCA, do?

They do the obvious. They resort to dirty tactics … for it is in their nature.

As the days get nearer to the polling day, I can assure you they will not stop at anything to THREATEN the rakyat. Their dirty tactics will get dirtier and dirtier.

But we will not be swayed. We will stand firm. We will get rid of this haprak party that only know how to screw the rakyat and benefit themselves. WE will show them that WE ARE THE BOSS and not them.

We will Vote Keadilan come March 8!

And for your information, we have filed a complaint with the Election Commission and lodged a police report (no: 2349/08) with the Setapak Police station against the Barang Naik party for their LATEST THREAT against the rakyat of Wangsa Maju. They have now resorted to using seditious posters and banners.


- There’s no name to nor ownership of this seditious banner.
That shows they have no guts. They only know how to LIE. -

The MCA are using the religion of Islam to instill fear in the voters and public, claiming PKR is working together with PAS to further their cause.

This is ABSOLUTE NONSENSE and A BLATANT LIE!

You, MCA, are LIARS!

PKR, like PAS, is part of the Barisan Rakyat which comprises of all other major opposition parties. Together, we are working to reclaim the country back into the hands of the rakyat. The rakyat is the boss and we believe the rakyat should have their say of WHO and HOW this country should be governed. We are doing just that. Nothing more. Nothing less.

Like I said before, the Barang Naik party will insult the intelligence of the rakyat. Just because they think bodoh they think we are like them. They are so wrong!

It’s the 21st century and the rakyat should be smart enough to see through the lies of this Barang Naik party. Only a desperate party will resort to desperate tactics.

People of Wangsa Maju, reject the lying Barang Naik party and Vote Keadilan on March 8! Thank you.

Vote for democracy! Vote for a stronger opposition!

PDF Print E-mail
Posted in Malaysia-Today by Raja Petra   
The 12th General Election is crucial for Malaysians. It will set the direction for the nation and will determine the status of democracy in this country. More importantly, the outcome of the results will decide the secular status of this nation which is under grave threat, says P Ramakrishnan.  We don’t need a strong government. We need a just government.

The rot has set in

Extremist elements are aggressively in the forefront pushing the Islamic agenda and ignoring the pluralistic character of this nation. They completely ignore the historic social contract, assiduously negotiated by the main communities in a give-and-take understanding to secure independence and forge a nation from our diverse cultures and religions.

Various groups and people have toiled and contributed to make this country what it is today. Our strength has always been in our ability to work together in a co-operative and compromising spirit to accommodate the interests and welfare of all Malaysians.

This live-and-let-live spirit is being undermined deliberately by certain politicians posturing uncompromisingly as champions of a single community to the detriment of our shared unity. While this stance may make them popular among certain sections of the population, it sends out very serious danger signals for the future well being of this nation.

Our democratic space has disappeared. We cannot hold discussions on issues deemed to be of utmost importance because certain elements oppose such discussions. We cannot walk peacefully to highlight certain grievances without the police resorting to high-handed tactics to break up such democratic actions. We cannot publish anything without a permit. We cannot form any associations without being registered. We cannot go to court to challenge unjust decisions of the Executive because that right has been taken away from us. We don’t get television and radio air-time or media space to articulate legitimate criticism against the government. This - and much more - has been taken away from us.

Our judiciary is in a shambles. It is a pity that a noble institution set up to safeguard justice has been destroyed by uncaring politicians only interested in perpetuating their power and position. It is so tainted and corrupted by unsavoury characters promoted to high places to do the biddings of the powerful. Deserving, honest and honourable judges were deliberately by-passed to keep the judiciary pliant to the Executive. The last hope for the common person to seek justice has been made a complete mockery.

Our education system has deteriorated to pathetic levels. It is no longer seen as a means of  ennobling young minds and empowering future leaders of the country with the right knowledge and values to mould them into healthy, mature, thinking and discerning citizens. The school system has become so polarised that it no longer reflects the multi-cultural make-up of the country. It is so bad that Marina Mahathir in her column in The Star revealed that she had pulled  her children out from the national schools because they have become Malay schools.

More disappointments and worries

Our parliament has turned out to be such a disappointment. Our elected representatives no longer stand as tall as the building itself unlike previous parliamentarians who came imbued with parliamentary traditions and healthy respect for democracy and vibrant debates. They crossed swords in a dignified manner without anger or rancour. These days debates have become shouting matches, spiced up with sick jokes and shocking sexist remarks. Even if certain members were to speak the truth and act according to their conscience they are punished for crossing party lines as was the case with the two MIC MPs and Shahrir Samad, the chairman of the Back Benchers Club.

Worse, the Barisan Nasional-dominated parliament has over the years passed terrible and demeaning bills and amendments that have taken away most of our fundamental rights and freedom. Instead of acting in the larger interest of the people and the nation, the BN-controlled parliament had passed all those obnoxious bills to keep the Executive in perpetual power.

Our unity over the last 50 years, instead of strengthening, has dissipated to worrying levels. It is a tragedy that we are now more divided than we have ever been before. Public policies and practices have widened the gap. People feel discriminated against, not only the non-Malays, but the Malays as well, when it comes to contracts, licences, promotions, loans, and scholarships, which invariably went to cronies and the well-connected. While we can blame the British for the divide-and-rule-policy, the BN has mastered this art to perfection to remain in power.

Corruption has pervaded our entire system. Through corruption, billions of ringgit have been lost at the expense of development and help for the poor. We have squandered our wealth through un-tendered projects, seeking and securing contract sales through middlemen, writing off billions of ringgit lost mysteriously, and through failed projects and contracts. Though the fight against corruption has been declared with pious intentions, so far nothing has happened to stamp out this scourge.

Well, fellow voters, the list of things that are wrong in this country can go on and on. The point is, do we want to let it go on? This is what we have to decide.

Do they need another huge mandate?

The BN asked for a strong mandate in all the previous elections. This mandate was given without fail. Indeed, the last mandate was unprecedented. It was a whopping 91 per cent of parliamentary seats.

What did this huge mandate amount to for the people? In what way has it benefited the country? The huge mandate produced a strong government. But it did not produce a just government. It  made the politicians powerful. But it did not empower the people or safeguard their fundamental rights and freedom. It is this huge mandate that has robbed us of our human rights and made us powerless. It is this huge mandate that has made this BN government so arrogant and unjust in its policies to the poor and the powerless.

Do they need another huge mandate? The answer must be a resounding NO! We don’t need a strong government. We need a just government. A just government does not need a huge mandate.

Another point to take into consideration is this: How did this strong government become so arrogant and uncaring? Simple. There was no strong Opposition in parliament. There was no Opposition to provide the necessary check and balance. There was no strong Opposition to force the government to act justly. There was no strong Opposition to prevent the numerous amendments to the Federal Constitution to take away our fundamental rights and freedom. There was no strong Opposition to ensure that the policies of the government were just and fair.

My fellow voters, vote for democracy. Vote for a strong opposition. Vote to deny a two-thirds’ majority. Do this and you will see the difference when the next parliament meets.

Do not fail yourself.
Do not fail the country.

Candidates for 2008 General Election (State Assemblies)

 
JOHOR
Johor

N.45 Stulang
Norman Joseph Fernandez
N.48 Skudai
Boo Cheng Hau
N.55 Pekan Nenas
Ahmad Bin Ton
N.52 Senai
Ong Kow Meng
N.28 Mengkibol
Ng Lam Hua
N.19 Yong Peng

Ng Lam Swa

N.23 Penggaram
Gan Peck Cheng
N.6 Bekok
Chang Teck Chee @ Chug Teck Chee
N.2 Jementah
Pang Hok Liong
N.12 Bentayan
Gwee Tong Hiang
N.10 Tangkak
Lee Fu Haw
N.30 Paloh
Tan Ting Chow
 

 
KEDAH
Kedah

N.11 Derga
Teoh Teik Guan
N.13 Kota Darul Aman
Lee Guan Aik
 

 
MELAKA
Melaka

N.19 Kesidang
Goh Leong San
N.20 Kota Laksamana
Betty Chew Gek Cheng
N.15 Bachang
Lim Jak Wong
N.21 Duyong
Damian Yeo Shen Li
N.14 Kelebang
Koh Sze Choon
N.24 Bemban
Ho Kia Kim
N.22 Bandar Hilir
Tey Kok Kiew
N.16 Ayer Keroh
Khoo Poay Tiong
 

 
NEGERI SEMBILAN
Negeri Sembilan

N.11 Lobak
Loke Siew Fook
N.21 Bukit Kepayang
Cha Kee Chin
N.36 Repah
Veerapan A/L Superamaniam
N.22 Rahang
Arumugam A/L Karuppan
N.12 Temiang
Ng Chin Tsai
N.1 Chennah
How Wee Shiong
N.8 Bahau
Teo Kok Seong
N.24 Senawang
Gunasekaren A/L Palasamy
N.10 Nilai
Yap Yew Weng
N.23 Mambau
Wong May May
N.30 Lukut
Ean Yong Tin Sin
 

 
PAHANG
Pahang

N.1 Tanah Rata
Go Mong Nging
N.7 Teras
Choong Siew Onn
N.33 Bilut
Tam Tai San
N.34 Ketari
Lee Kok Yeep
N.35 Saba
Kamache A/P A Doray Rajoo
N.30 Mentakab
Ng Kwi Ling
N.38 Triang
Leong Ngah Ngah
 

 
PENANG
Penang

N.7 Sungai Puyu
Phee Boon Poh
N.8 Bagan Jermal
Lim Hock Seng
N.9 Bagan Dalam
Tanasekharan A/L Autherapady
N.13 Berapit
Ong Kok Fooi
N.15 Padang Lalang
Tan Cheong Heng
N.16 Perai
P. Ramasamy A/L Palanisamy
N.19 Jawi
Tan Beng Huat
N.22 Tanjong Bunga
Teh Yee Cheu
N.23 Air Puteh
Lim Guan Eng
N.27 Pengkalan Kota
Lau Keng Ee
N.28 Komtar
Ng Wei Aik
N.29 Datok Keramat
Jagdeep Singh Deo A/L Karpal Singh
N.30 Sungai Pinang
Koid Teng Guan
N.31 Batu Lancang
Law Heng Kiang
N.32 Seri Delima
Sanisvara Nethaji Rayer A/L Rajaji
N.33 Air Itam
Wong Hon Wai
N.34 Paya Terubong
Yeoh Soon Hin
N.26 Padang Kota
Chow Kon Yeow
N.25 Pulau Tikus
Koay Teng Hai
 

 
PERAK
Perak

N.26 Tebing Tinggi
Ong Boon Piow
N.27 Pasir Pinji
Su Keong Siong
N.25 Canning
Wong Kah Woh
N.30 Buntong
Sivasubramaniam A/L Athi Narayanan
N.28 Bercham
Sum Cheok Leng
N.29 Kepayang
Loke Chee Yan
N.33 Tronoh
Sivakumar A/L Varatharaju Naidu
N.32 Menglembu
Lim Pek Har
N.31 Jelapang
Hee Yit Foong
N.17 Pokok Assam
Yee Seu Kai
N.18 Aulong
Yew Tian Hoe
N.22 Jalong
Leong Mee Meng
N.41 Keranji
Chen Fook Chye
N.40 Malim Nawar
Keshvinder Singh A/L Kashmir Singh
N.37 Pantai Remis
Nga Kor Ming
N.50 Sitiawan
Ngeh Koo Ham
N.55 Pasir Bedamar
Seah Leong Peng
N.57 Sungkai
Sivanesan A/L Achalingam
 

 
SABAH
Sabah

N.13 Inanam
Jeffrey Kumin @ John
N.14 Likas
Joan Goh Penn Nee
N.17 Tanjong Aru
Yang Chan Tsze @ Teddy Yang
N.16 Luyang
Fung Kong Win
N.19 Kapayan
Stephen Jacob Jimbangan
N.34 Liawan
Yangul @ Lawrence Bin Mogidau
N.44 Karamunting
Chok Kon Tack
N.47 Kuamut
Jusing @ Geoffrey Bin Sabran
N.57 Sri Tanjong
Wong Sze Phin @ Jimmy
N.46 Tanjong Papat
Teo Yan Boon @ Anthony
 

 
SELANGOR
Selangor

N.36 Damansara Utama
Cheah Wing Yin
N.6 Kuala Kubu Baharu
K Annamalai Ramu A/L Kandasamy
N.56 Sungai Pelek
Sivananthan A/L Arumugam
N.28 Seri Kembangan
Ean Yong Hian Wah
N.4 Sekinchan
Ng Suee Lim
N.44 Sungai Pinang
Teng Chang Khim
N.30 Kinrara
Teresa Kok Suh Sim
N.31 Subang Jaya
Yeoh Tseow Suan
N.47 Pandamaran
Liu Tian Khiew
N.22 Teratai
Lee Ying Ha
N.27 Balakong
Yap Lum Chin
N.34 Bukit Gasing
Lee Poh Lin
N.48 Kota Alam Shah
Manoharan A/L Malayalam
N.35 Kampung Tunku
Lau Weng San
N.52 Teluk Datuk
Tan Choon Swee
 

Candidates for 2008 General Election (Parliament)

 
JOHOR
Johor

P.163 Kulai
Ng Pak Siong
P.165 Tanjong Piai
Ahmad bin Ton
P.152 Kluang
Ng Lam Hua
P.145 Bakri
Er Teck Hwa
P.142 Labis
Teo Eng Ching
P.140 Segamat
Pang Hok Liong
 

 
KUALA LUMPUR
Federal Territory

P.114 Kepong
Tan Seng Giaw @ Tan Chun Tin
P.120 Bukit Bintang
Fong Kui Lun
P.122 Seputeh
Teresa Kok Suh Sim
P.123 Cheras
Tan Kok Wai
P.117 Segambut
Lim Lip Eng
 

 
MELAKA
Melaka

P.138 Kota Melaka
Sim Tong Him
P.135 Alor Gajah
Tan Lay Siang
 

 
NEGERI SEMBILAN
Negeri Sembilan

P.130 Rasah
Loke Siew Fook
P.128 Seremban
John A/L Fernandez
 

 
PAHANG
Pahang

P.78 Cameron Highlands
Apalasamy A/L Jataliah
P.80 Raub
Abu Bakar Bin Lebai Sudin
 

 
PENANG
Penang

P.43 Bagan
Lim Guan Eng
P.45 Bukit Mertajam
Chong Eng
P.46 Batu Kawan
P. Ramasamy A/L Palanisamy
P.48 Bukit Bendera
Liew Chin Tong
P.49 Tanjong
Chow Kon Yeow
P.50 Jelutong
Ooi Chuan Aun
P.51 Bukit Gelugor
Karpal Singh A/L Ram Singh
 

 
PERAK
Perak

P.64 Ipoh Timor
Lim Kit Siang
P.65 Ipoh Barat
M.Kulasegaran A/L V.Murugeson
P.66 Batu Gajah
Fong Po Kuan
P.60 Taiping
Nga Kor Ming
P.70 Kampar
Keong Meng Sing
P.68 Beruas
Ngeh Koo Ham
P.76 Telok Intan
Manogaram A/L Marimuthu
 

 
SABAH
Sabah

P.171 Sepanggar
Ewol Bin Muji @ Edward Ewol Mujie
P.186 Sandakan
Chong Chui Lin @ Shanty
P.172 Kota Kinabalu
Hiew King Cheu
P.180 Keningau
Peter Kodou @ Peter Anthony Kodou
P.190 Tawau
Chan Foong Hin
 

 
SARAWAK
Sarawak

P.195 Bandar Kuching
Chong Chieng Jen
P.196 Stampin
Voon Lee Shan
P.208 Sarikei
Wong Hua Seh
P.211 Lanang
Wong Kee Woan
P.212 Sibu
Wong Ho Leng
P.217 Bintulu
Lim Su Kien
P.219 Miri
Fong Pau Teck
 

 
SELANGOR
Selangor

P.106 Petaling Jaya Utara
Tony Pua Kiam Wee
P.102 Serdang
Teo Nie Ching
P.110 Klang
Charles Anthony A/L R.Santiago
P.103 Puchong
Gobin Singh Deo
 

Why Christians prefer to vote for PAS, not BN.

Wonder if this response was published by the STAR (?)
Response to Wong Chun Wai - Why Christians prefer to vote for PAS, not BN.
Dear Mr. Wong Chun Wai, ( I know he is a Datuk, so what?)

I refer to your commentary in The Star (29 Feb 2008) in which you wrote:

” I hear church groups telling their congregation to vote anything opposition including PAS, which is simply naïve and emotional.
Whatever the flaws of the system, it still works, despite some occasional hitches,” said one Penang Barisan leader.

Why didn’t you name that Penang Barisan leader? Because this quote is your personal view. Writers like you, who are de facto
press secretaries of the MCA, write your views and attribute them to some sources or political analysts. Please lah, don’t mock
at our intelligence!

Mr Wong, a flawed system doesn’t work!!! If it is flawed, it is flawed. How can it work?

I understand you are a Christian but I wonder how much you understand the Gospels or the very life of Jesus Christ and what
he stood for.

Our Lord would not have been crucified had he accepted “the flaws of the system” of His times. He never asked his people to
close their eyes to the “flaws of the system” and instead focus on development , personal comfort, bank accounts and roads.

He stood up against the corrupt leaders who were fleecing the people. He condemned them as dead man’s tombs, hypocrites,
vipers etc (please read Matthew 23). The entire chapter is condemnation of the corrupt leaders of the Law.

How could one who professes to be a Christian choose to prop up a regime that is utterly corrupt and immoral? How could a
Christian vote for candidates who are unwilling to defend the rights of his religion? How could a Christian support a regime
that denies the weak non-Muslim to seek redress in any court of law?

What is your take on abuse of power, the dismantling of the Judiciary, the corrupt government leaders who inflate their bank
accounts with money that belongs to the people? What is your stand on the confiscation of Christian literature and the Bible
or the banning of the term “Allah” (mind you, this was approved by the Cabinet of which MCA Ministers are members)

Aren’t all these precursors of more frightening things to come? Have you thought what awaits your children’s future if this
trend continues?

What is your stand on the creeping Islamization of the country and the utter subservience of the MCA that you represent, to
its political masters, UMNO?

Why should I give my vote to a MCA or Gerakan Chinese who will not defend my religious rights? A good MCA leader who
cannot defend my rights is of no use to me.

As a Christian, should we be more concerned about Truth, Freedom, Justice, good governance, honesty and righteousness
than bread and butter issues or clogged drains and tarred roads?.

Shouldn’t a Christian stand up for the poor, the oppressed and the marginalized. (Please read Matthew 6).

UMNO has done more damage to my religious rights than PAS. It is UMNO which is snatching away dead bodies, not PAS.
It is UMNO which is separating children from parents and husbands from their wives, not PAS. It is UMNO that threatened
us with the keris, not PAS.

Therefore it is not “naïve or emotional” for a Christian to give his/her vote to PAS against the apartheid inclined regime that
is racist and utterly devoid of honestly and morality.

The government has to earn that Christian vote. It is not given free of charge. Sir, there is such a thing as protest vote.
Thank You.

Deathbed conversions not what religion is about

Last minute religious conversions, when patients are about to die, are not uncommon phenomena. Anyone who has worked in a hospital will tell you this.

Sometimes, when a person is very ill, religious workers (who are not of the dying person’s faith) will visit, comfort and perhaps even pray for the patient. Sometimes the dying person is asked to pray with them. Often this is done when the patient’s relatives are not around.

So, when the person dies, a dispute can sometimes occur. The religious workers will come forward and claim that the deceased person embraced their faith at the last minute and very often it is their word against the relatives’ word.

When a person is very ill, he might not be in the right frame of mind to decide whether or not to stick to the faith he has practiced his entire life. Very often, he might allow these workers to pray for him either out of courtesy or the apprehension of approaching death. Or he might be so ill that he does not know what is really going on around him.

It is really inconceivable to think that a person could suddenly abandon something he has believed in his entire life and embrace a new religion. It is also inconceivable that he could understand and believe in something within such a short timespan.

When a dispute arises out of this, the people that suffer most will be the spouse and the family. Just look at the photograph of the late Gan Eng Gor’s widow which has been posted on many blogs lately. The lady was crying so helplessly.

All religions teach compassion. No religion would want to be the cause of such great suffering and sadness for a family. It is only the actions of overzealous religious followers who, in following the form but not the true spirit of their religious teachings, cause so much suffering and bitterness.

God would not condone this. God would not want a family to be separated, either in life or in death. By all means, pray for the dying person. By all means, do all the good deeds to help him. But if ever he wishes to be converted on his deathbed, please, let the family know in advance.

It would be better to try to convert someone when they are healthy and kicking so that they are in the right frame of mind to decide whether there is anything in the new faith worth abandoning their old faith for.

To convert someone just for the sake of converting, or for the sake of statistics, is not what God wishes. If you wish to convert someone, you must make sure that he really understands and fully believes in the teachings of that particular faith. Otherwise, you may separate the body and heart. This is not what religion is about.

The world would be a much better place if only we remembered a simple teaching from Confucius: Do not do onto others what you do not want others to do onto you.

What Are Human Rights?

PDF Print E-mail

Human rights are more a philosophical or moral concept than a legal one. The origins of today’s human rights ideology can be found in 17th Century liberalism. John Locke (1632-1704), among others, developed the idea of rights that precede the state and the guaranteeing of which is the basis of the state’s authority.

By human rights we mean the rights that belong to all humans equally. Thinking about human rights as rights belonging to all people is quite a recent development. Earlier the rights of an individual were determined by his birth or social status as in a class society. Today we consider as human rights mainly those rights that are protected by universal or regional human rights conventions. Human rights conventions are legally binding international treaties between states. In the conventions the states commit themselves to guaranteeing certain rights both to their own citizens and to other people residing in their territory.

 The proclamation of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights on the 10th of December 1948 in the General Assembly of the United Nations can be seen as a turning point in the international protection of human rights. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights was prepared during the years 1947 and 1948 in the Commission on Human Rights appointed by the Economic and Social Council of the UN and then in the General Assembly. Even though the contribution of western countries was great in the preparation of the Declaration, it would be wrong to say that it represents only a western concept of human rights. The countries in Latin America, for example, were very active in formulating the Declaration and even as the UN was being founded, they produced their own drafts of the Declaration.

Human rights are often characterised as universal, inalienable and fundamental. The universality of human rights has two meanings. On the one hand, the universality of human rights prohibits discrimination on the grounds of sex, colour, social status or other similar characteristic. On the other hand, the universality of human rights refers to the global applicability of human rights. Human Rights are common to all people on all continents irrespective of cultural or economic differences.

The inalienability of human rights reflects the idea of natural individual rights that precede the state’s authority. Each individual has human rights on the basis of his/her humanity. Therefore these rights can no more be taken away from him/her by a decision of the authorities than by his/her own consent. The inalienability of human rights also means that a person can not legally give over his/her human rights by selling himself/herself as a slave.

The fact that human rights are considered as fundamental, means that only the most important rights should be called human rights. Articles 1 to 28 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights contain a list of the rights and freedoms that were considered important enough in 1948. Later developments in human rights documents have slightly broadened this list, but not to a significant degree. Some parts of the Declaration protect such rights and freedoms that have since proved difficult when adopting binding intergovernmental conventions. A refugee’s right to seek and enjoy asylum, the right to a nationality and the protection of property are examples of such rights.

Human rights are about the freedom from something and the right to something. Human rights are about the obligation of the state to respect, protect and fulfil human rights towards its citizens.

Resources

We conduct human rights training with NGOs and Community Groups to raise awareness on human rights in Malaysia. Feel free to contact us if you would like to arrange a human rights training in your organisation or area.

Below are some materials that we use in our trainings:

Reference

RM1 mil spent in poll ads first 3 days: TI (Malaysiakini)

PDF Print E-mail
 
The ruling Barisan Nasional coalition has spent RM1 million in print media advertising in the first three days of the election campaign, said corruption watchdog Transparency International-Malaysia. “In the first three days of the period under monitor - Feb 25 to 27 - BN was projected to have spent a cumulative total of RM1.049 million,” said TI president Ramon V Navaratnam.

The amount does not include TV advertisements in which TI conceded were where the “lion’s share of election advertising monies are believed to go”.

However, the organisation will begin monitoring political parties’ expenses for TV election advertisements beginning today.

According to Ramon, the TI study was part of a regional project to promote transparency in political financing.

Over the 13-day campaigning period, TI is monitoring election advertisements in six English dailies, five Malay newspapers, four Chinese titles and three Tamil dailies.

Ramon said that TI’s estimated advertisement cost is based on normal advertisement rates quoted by the various publications surveyed.

If the cost of advertisements was to be divided proportionally among BN candidates, TI said that each parliamentary contestant would have spent RM2,220, while each state candidate, RM1,103 on print advertising alone.

Scrutinise candidates expenses, EC told

Ramon argued that this cost should be reflected in the candidates’ expenses where under the law a parliamentary candidate can spend only up to RM200,000 while a state candidate RM100,000, in election campaign expenditure.

This means that BN candidates have only RM197,780 (for parliament seat) and RM98,897 (state) left to spend for the remaining 10 days of the campaign period.

“TI urges all (political) parties to declare all their advertisement expenses and to require their candidates to report their respective share of such expenses,” said Ramon.

“TI also urges the Election Commission to closely scrutinise the candidates’ expenses report and be prepared to lodge police reports for any under-reporting found.”

According to TI, there was no election advertising by opposition parties - PAS, DAP and PKR - over the first three days of the electoral campaign in the 18 monitored newspapers.

“This is the first time that campaign expense monitoring is being monitored,” said Ramon, who is a former top civil servant.

“This is a new addition to election process monitoring and media content monitoring that had started from previous elections and is being performed in this election as well.”

Human Rights Demands for the Coming General Elections 2008

PDF Print E-mail
Our forebears have fought for Merdeka in 1957 so that all men and women, regardless of race and religion, can live a life with dignity, free from fear and free from want in a new country where freedom, justice and peace prevail.Regrettably, after 50 years of independence under the rule of the Alliance and the National Front (Barisan Nasional) coalitions, human rights in Malaysia have deteriorated dramatically. Indeed, it makes a mockery of the Merdeka that we achieved when the vibrant freedom of the press, expression, assembly and association exercised by our forebears against the British during colonial times would be lost under the rule of our own people after independence.

It is high time for the people to reclaim our rights, our freedoms and our country in the coming general election.
1. Reject Racialised Politics and Racism

The kind of politics perpetuated by Barisan Nasional has divided the citizens rather than united the country. Human rights violations, abuses of powers, mismanagement of public funds and corruption in the government thrive under the protective umbrella of racialised politics. Anyone challenging cronyism, corruption and nepotism of the powers-that-be would be persecuted for inciting racial tensions and posing a threat to national security. Malaysian citizens, living under the fear of the Internal Security Act and the bogeyman of the May 13 tragedy, are silenced and stripped of their rights.

We call on all voters to reject candidates and political parties that resort to racial and religious extremism. We demand for the enactment of a Race Relations Act and a permanent Race Relations Commission to outlaw racism and incitement of racial hatred.

2. Repeal All Emergency Laws and Laws that permit Detention without Trial

Despite the fact that Malaysians have lived in peace without war or conflict in the last three decades, the emergency laws and anti-subversion laws previously proclaimed by the government, which vest enormous emergency powers in the hands of the state and suspend civil and political rights of the people, remain in force to this date. These laws have been rampantly abused by the ruling parties.

We call for the four proclamations of emergency in 1964, 1966, 1969 and 1977 to be revoked officially by the coming parliament. We demand that all emergency and anti-subversion laws and measures, especially the Internal Security Act 1960 and the Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969 and the Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985 which provide for indefinite detention without trial, be repealed immediately. We demand that immediate release of all those detained under the emergency laws be charged in court or be released immediately.

3. Respect and Protect Freedom of Expression, Assembly and Association

Freedom of expression, assembly and association are fundamental rights for citizens to participate in policy decision making. However, these rights have been continuously curtailed with the justification of national security when in realty it is no more than suppressing the citizens from raising legitimate concerns such as corruption, abuses of powers and the failures of the government policies.

We call for the abolition of the Sedition Act and the enactment of a Whistle-Blower Protection legislation to protect freedom of expression. The right to freedom of assembly and association should be allowed to be exercised without hindrance while all authorities’ decisions should be subjected to judicial scrutiny. We call for the abolition of Section 27 of the Police Act that subject public assemblies to the approval of the police.

4. Form the Independent Police Complaints and Misconduct Commission

The rising crime rates in the country in recent years have indicated that the Royal Malaysian Police has failed in its duty. To make matters worse, the police force today has reduced itself to become a tool of coercion and violence for the powers-that-be to remain in power. The rights of the Malaysian citizens are trampled. A professional police force that is effective in fighting crimes, respects human rights while enforcing the laws, politically impartial in carrying out their duties and free from corruption can only be achieved with an independent oversight mechanism with adequate powers.

We demand for the implementation of the 125 recommendations made by the Royal Commission on police reform, especially the formation of the Independent Police Complaint and Misconduct Commission (IPCMC).

5. Stamp out Corruption

Corruption has been widespread in the government and unchallenged under the protection of the powerful ruling elites. Mega projects are awarded to individuals and companies who are politically well connected. In the process, project costs have multiplied to exorbitant levels and have led to huge unnecessary social costs at the expense of public monies. Tax payers are made to pay double for the corruption and the rising costs of living as a result of the former.

We demand that all ministers and public servants declare publicly their personal wealth before taking office. All ministers and public servants who live beyond their means should be investigated and prosecuted for corruption. We call on the Anti-Corruption Agency to be made independent from the Prime Minister’s office and to report to the Parliament solely.

6. Uphold the Independence of the Judiciary

The recent Lingam tape scandal has confirmed the widespread public perception that our judiciary is highly corrupt and partial to the powers-that-be, especially after the 1988 judicial crisis. It has failed to defend the rights of the people and deliver justice to the victims of the rich and the powerful.

We demand judicial independence to be restored immediately by rescinding the constitutional amendment of Article 121(1) that undermines the separation of powers in a functioning democracy and the formation of an independent judicial commission in appointing and promoting judges.

7. End the New Economic Policy

The New Economic Policy (NEP) has deviated from its original objectives and has become a tool for a small group of ruling elites of different ethnic communities to accumulate enormous wealth. The majority of the Malays has hardly benefited from the policy while the poor non-Malays are deprived of social assistance. The NEP is a divisive policy that perpetuates racial discrimination. It also compromises meritocracy and undermines our country’s competitiveness in the globalised world.

We demand that the NEP be abolished immediately and be replaced with an affirmative action policy that is based on individual needs and merits regardless of race or religion.

8. Reform the Electoral System

The Malaysian electoral system is deeply flawed and is not able to reflect the true popular will of the people. It has deviated from the ‘one person one vote’ principle with large disparities of the number of voters from one constituency to another. The electoral roll is rigged and postal votes are often deployed by ruling parties to rob victory in crucial areas. The voters are deprived of the right to information and the right to make informed decisions with the opposition having no access to mainstream media. The Election Commission is partial to the ruling parties.

We demand the reform of the electoral system by setting up a royal commission on electoral reforms with the aims to restore the ‘one person one vote’ principle, clean up the electoral roll, abolish postal votes and ensure equal access to the media by all parties. Local government election must be restored. Appointment of members of the Election Commission must be done in a transparent and accountable manner with public consultation.

9. Uphold Press Freedom

Press freedom in Malaysia has been severely curtailed by the restrictive laws such as the Printing Presses and Publication Act that requires annual license renewal of newspapers and magazines. The situation is made worse with the ownership of mainstream media and the abuse of state media such as RTM by the ruling parties. This seriously undermines the right to information and the right to make informed decision of the citizen to check the abuse of powers and corruption in the gove