The Catonsville Nine 40 years later

By VICTOR L. SIMPSON, Associated Press Writer Tue Apr 15, 9:25 PM ET

ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE, Md. - Pope Benedict XVI U.S. President George W. Bush (R) walks as Pope Benedict XVI acknowledges the crowd upon arriving at Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington, April 15, 2008. The Pope is beginning a six-day trip to the United States, during which he will pray at Ground Zero in New York, address the United Nations and try to heal wounds from a sexual abuse scandal.       REUTERS/Jason Reed    (UNITED STATES)stepped onto U.S. soil for the time as pontiff Tuesday, arriving to a presidential handshake and wild cheering only hours after he admitted that he is “deeply ashamed” of the clergy sex abuse scandal that has devastated the American church.

U.S. President George W. Bush (R) walks as Pope Benedict XVI acknowledges the crowd upon arriving at Andrews Air Force Base outside Washington, April 15, 2008. The Pope is beginning a six-day trip to the United States, during which he will pray at Ground Zero in New York, address the United Nations and try to heal wounds from a sexual abuse scandal.       REUTERS/Jason Reed    (UNITED STATES)
Reuters Photo:
U.S. President George W. Bush (R) walks as
Pope Benedict XVI acknowledges the crowd upon
arriving in the US 

Benedict gave hundreds of spectators a two-handed wave as he stepped off a special Alitalia airliner that brought him from Rome. Students from a local Catholic school screamed ecstatically when they saw the pope, who shook hands warmly with President Bush, first lady Laura Bush and their daughter Jenna on the tarmac.

Hundreds of onlookers, some from local Roman Catholic parishes, clapped and shouted as they watched the scene from nearby bleachers.

Benedict tackled the most painful issue facing the U.S. Catholic Church — clergy sex abuse — on his flight to America. The U.S. church has paid out $2 billion in abuse costs since 1950, most of that in just the last six years.

Seemingly in a nod to his American flock, the pope spoke in English as he answered questions submitted in advance by reporters.

“It is a great suffering for the church in the United States and for the church in general and for me personally that this could happen,” Benedict said. “It is difficult for me to understand how it was possible that priests betray in this way their mission … to these children.”

“I am deeply ashamed, and we will do what is possible so this cannot happen again in the future,” the pope said.

Benedict pledged that pedophiles would not be priests in the Catholic Church.

“I do not wish to talk at this moment about homosexuality, but about pedophilia, which is another thing,” he said.

“We will absolutely exclude pedophiles from the sacred ministry. It is more important to have good priests than many priests. We will do everything possible to heal this wound.”

Gary Bergeron, who was molested by a priest in the 1970s in Lowell, Mass., called the comments a “step I’ve been looking for.” Bergeron said he was disappointed that Benedict did not plan to visit the Archdiocese of Boston, the scene of a case that sparked the greater scandal, but urged the pontiff to meet with victims this week.

The pope’s promise failed to mollify other advocates for abuse victims, however. They said the problem is not just molester priests, but bishops and other church authorities who have let errant clergymen continue to serve even after repeated allegations.

“It’s easy and tempting to continually focus on the pedophile priests themselves,” said Peter Isely, a board member of the Survivors Network of those Abused by Priests. “It’s harder but crucial to focus on the broader problem — complicity in the rest of the church hierarchy.”

Benedict’s pilgrimage is the first trip by a pontiff to the United States since the Boston case in 2002 triggered a crisis that spread throughout the United States and beyond. Hundreds of new charges — many dating back decades — have surfaced each year since. There were 691 new accusations in 2007 alone, according to an annual report from the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops.

As head of the Vatican agency that enforces adherence to Catholic doctrine, then-Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger was heavily involved in gaining Vatican approval for the reforms U.S. bishops proposed for the American church. The bishops have since released several reports analyzing the scandal and have pledged that all credibly accused priests will be pulled from public ministry.

Benedict described his pilgrimage as a journey to meet a “great people and a great church.” He spoke about the American model of religious values within a system of separation of church and state.

President Bush made the unusual gesture of greeting Benedict at Andrews Air Force Base — the first time he has welcomed a foreign leader there. The two will meet again Wednesday, when a crowd of 9,000 or more is expected at the White House to greet Benedict on his 81st birthday.

Aides say he is in good health and the pope seemed spry as he stepped energetically off the plane Tuesday.

Benedict said he will discuss immigration with Bush, including the difficulties of families who are separated by immigration.

While the pope and Bush differ on such major issues on the Iraq war, capital punishment and the U.S. embargo against Cuba, they do find common ground in opposing abortion, gay marriage and embryonic stem cell research.

White House press secretary Dana Perino said she wouldn’t rule out the sex abuse being discussed between the pope and the president, but added that it’s not necessarily one of Bush’s top priorities in his meeting with Benedict.

Perino said the two leaders would likely discuss human rights, religious tolerance and the fight against violent extremism. She downplayed their differences over Iraq.

Benedict “will hear from the president that America and the world need to hear his message, that God is love, that human life is sacred, that we all must be guided by common moral law, and that we have responsibilities to care for our brothers and sisters in need, at home and across the world,” Perino said.

After making little headway in his efforts to rekindle the faith in his native Europe, the German-born Benedict is visiting a country where many of the 65 million Catholics are eager to hear what he says and get to know him. A poll released Sunday by the Center for Applied Research in the Apostolate at Georgetown University found eight in 10 Catholics are somewhat or very satisfied with his leadership.

Benedict is scheduled to visit U.N. headquarters on Friday to meet with Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon and to address the General Assembly.

Ban said he is looking forward to a wide-ranging discussion with the pontiff on issues ranging from climate change and fighting poverty to disarmament and promoting cultural dialogue.

“We are now facing many challenges these days,” Ban told reporters. “We need really strong spiritual support from the pope.”

The pope’s visit will be the fourth by a leader of the Roman Catholic church to the United Nations: Paul VI came in 1965 when the U.N. celebrated its 20th anniversary; John Paul II came in 1979 at the start of his pontificate and again in 1995 for the U.N.’s 50th anniversary.

___

Associated Press writer Edith M. Lederer at the United Nations contributed to this report.

Pope Benedict XVI arrives in the USA

 

By VICTOR L. SIMPSON • Associated Press Writer • April 15, 2008

ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE, Md. — Pope Benedict XVI is in the United States.

Benedict arrived Tuesday on his first papal journey to the U.S. He was greeted off the plane by President George W. Bush, first lady Laura Bush and their daughter, Jenna. The pope waved as he came off the plane and shook hands with the president and his family. Students from a Catholic school squealed at the sight of the pope.

On the flight to the United States from Rome, Benedict addressed the most painful issue for the Roman Catholic Church in America — clergy sex abuse. The U.S. church has paid out $2 billion in abuse costs since 1950.

The pope said he is “deeply ashamed” of the problem and vowed to keep pedophiles out of the priesthood.

In your voice

Read reactions to this story

User Image

michels68 wrote:

I hve read the comments on this issue in the church. I think the people accusing prists in the church of abuse are suing for personal gain. I am a Catholic, I was an alter boy, went to Catholic School, and knew a lot of clergy. There was never any form of abuse. lets look at the facts. Why did these people wait so long to start this scandall? Why did one person start in motion a large number of copycat lawsuits by pepole looking for a quick buck. Also, why has there never been any ctiminal charges brought againist any prist? I think most of this scandal is friviolus media hype. It is anti Catholic, anti Christian, and yellow dog journalisim. Abuse may or may not of happen. However, according to our consitution every man is innocent until proven guilty in a criminal court. I think the church paid this money out to a group of low life human beings seeking easy money.
4/16/2008 2:32:04 AM

Recommend Report Abuse

User Image

Kasimer wrote:

usworker….I get where you are coming from …..but based what Pope John Paul II affirmed …married priests as the norm doesnt look to be a reality any time soon ( if ever)….
4/15/2008 10:04:40 PM

Recommend Report Abuse

User Image

Kasimer wrote:

vnufall…Points understood. To say nothing has happened really isnt true either. It also depends on the individual Diocese(s) handling of the issues..I know for a fact that the Diocese of Lansing has taken seriously the issues of the pedophile priests and the damage and harm caused to especially the victims as well as to the members of the diocese….the Diocese of Lansing has been proactive and staunch in their efforts….at the same time I am not sugar coating or denying the slow process of moving things forward across all Diocese. Not making excuses for anyone…..trottinhorse - the Franciscan - made some excellent points in his comments today…..again I do understand where you are coming from and not downplaying it….I am looking forward to see what the Pope has to say ( along with millions of other people) and what action takes place…Peace.
4/15/2008 10:02:37 PM

Recommend Report Abuse

User Image

usworker wrote:

I grew up Catholic. I say he should just let the priests get married. What year is it anyways?
4/15/2008 9:52:38 PM

Recommend (1) Report Abuse

User Image

vnufall wrote:

well yes i understand what you are saying kasimer. this is a big issue for the catholic church-pedophilia. since the conference of catholic bishops in 2002 when things were supposed to be really looked at, and attempts to make up for wrongs…nothing has happened. it was all talk, little action. the legal theologians took a lot of time and effort to cover for these priests. i think the 3 adults that suffered under this irish priest just wanted some assurance from the vatican that their voices were heard. by the way the irish priest was deported back to ireland by the us. he was living in an apartment, no one in the area was remotely aware he was a pedophile and he drew a pension from the catholic church! this disturbs me.
4/15/2008 9:48:01 PM

Recommend Report Abuse

User Image

Kasimer wrote:

trottinhorse…..well said…..if people can put aside their anger…take a step back and read what you stated….let it sink in …..then perhaps all of us can move forward…. as you stated…”We should not confuse the human failings of our fellow christians,(e.g. priests) with our faith. The administration of our faith (clergy) are human, and not perfect. We need to deal with that problem on an individual basis. We should not project the faults of individuals onto our faith”….and ” Lets recognize the human failings of our fellow man…….and go on !!!! “

4/15/2008 9:38:24 PM

Recommend Report Abuse

User Image

Kasimer wrote:

BubbRubb… Did you read the same sentence from davelaw that I did…here it is “I think you have proven by your statements that you can see the myth of religious institutions. Our founding fathers saw it, hence the establishment clause of the constitution.”…I am not making or using an argument of Freedom OF Religion vs Freedom From Religion….davelaw referenced the constitution and our founding fathers intention on Religion. I am pointing out what IS WRITTEN in the constitution. You’re conclusion is ill-founded. And the only thing that is NONSENSE are your statements….refer to trottinhorse’s response to you for details. Here is something else to chew on….Freedom does not equal License to do what we please…

4/15/2008 9:31:32 PM

Recommend Report Abuse

User Image

MAJMark wrote:

BubbRubb “We don’t need to write about it on our money”
If you dont like it, you can always give YOUR money away, right?
4/15/2008 9:18:12 PM

Recommend Report Abuse

User Image

Kasimer wrote:

vnufall…I respect the position of the people from California with the issues with the Irish priest…at the same time because they were “turned” away at the gate doesn’t mean the Pope wouldn’t have cared to speak to them…what I mean to say is…let us say I had a problem with the mayor in my city. I go to Washington DC and end up at the WHitehouse…I ask to speak to President Bush about the issues.But I am turned away…does that mean my issues arent important ? No. Does that mean that Pres Bush doesnt care what I have to say? ( maybe /.maybe not)…but it would be foolish to think I can just show up and expect to see the PResident ….it just wouldnt happen….do you see the logic I am trying to provide? Sometimes it is in planning, sometimes it is knowing the sheer amount of time constraints that leaders of enormous entities like the US and The Catholic Church face everday….I am not taking away from anyone’s issues…just trying to put in common sense/logic.
4/15/2008 9:17:05 PM

Recommend Report Abuse

User Image

Kasimer wrote:

Finneous ..you made an excellent point ,.,..”These men who are being ordained now are a far cry from the hippie generation that we have been burdened with from the failed liberal experiments and infiltration of the 50-70’s.”……….This is the point….let us focus on Today , Tomorrow….learn from the past but not live there…..look forward to the future…but not be locked into fantasy of what is not yet to be.
4/15/2008 9:03:26 PM

POPE BENEDICT XVI

The Tampa Tribune

A LOOK BACK

April 19, 2005: Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger is elected. He will be known as Pope Benedict XVI.

June 10, 2005: The pope criticizes the use of condoms and says the church is leading the battle against HIV/AIDS by teaching chastity.

Nov. 29, 2005: In his first major ruling, Benedict and the Vatican impose restrictions on homosexuals becoming priests.

Jan. 25, 2006: Benedict releases his first encyclical, “Deus Caritas Est” (God is Love).

Sept. 12, 2006: Benedict quotes a Byzantine emperor to criticize fanaticism in Islam, sparking protests from Muslims.

Sept. 17, 2006: The pope apologizes and says the medieval quotes did not reflect his personal views.

Oct. 11, 2006: Benedict eases restrictions on the Latin Mass.

April 11, 2007: Benedict publishes a new book, “Creation and Evolution,” in which he claims Darwin’s theory of evolution cannot be proved.

May 13, 2007: In Brazil, Benedict says that colonial-era evangelization in the New World did not represent “the imposition of a foreign culture.”

May 23, 2007: Although he does not apologize, Benedict says it is impossible to ignore the “unjustified crimes” that accompanied evangelization in the New World.

Nov. 6, 2007: Benedict becomes the first pope to meet with a reigning Saudi king.

March 22, 2008: Italy’s most prominent Muslim commentator converts to Catholicism and is baptized by Benedict.

Research by MICHAEL

GANABATHIRAU

From:

Add sender to Contacts

To:

malaysiafm@yahoogroups.co.uk

[piinang: Dear brother, they can put you and others behind the bar, but they fail to understand, NO ONE CAN STOP THE MAKKAL SHAKTHI]

Ganabathirau, the unsung hero

Tony Pua | Dec 18, 07 3:59pm
I’d just like to provide a little more insight to one of those arrested - a little known unsung hero, 34-year-old lawyer, V Ganabathirau, who hit the limelight recently as one of the core leaders of Hindraf.

As you may have read from the New Straits Times, Gana is a DAP member. What makes the whole ugly episode so close to me is that Gana is a member of the DAP Damansara branch, of which I am chairperson. Gana joined me in March this year and subsequently helped form the Taman Muda branch in Shah Alam of which he is the advisor.

Having known him for the past eight months or so, I cannot claim to know him inside out. But there are some things which I will vouch for him with my life. Gana is not a racist. He is not a religious fanatic, neither is he a terrorist, as he is insinuated to be. He is the complete opposite of what the Pak Lah administration, through the mainstream mouthpieces, would like to paint him to be.

Gana is a full-blooded Malaysian who strongly believes that all Malaysians regardless of ethnicity must have equal opportunities to succeed. While some may quibble over the fact that Hindraf could have taken a greater multi-racial outlook in its position, no right-thinking Malaysian will deny them the fact that the overwhelming majority of Indians in this country are severely marginalised and live below or near the poverty line. With the way Malaysian politics is framed at this point of time, it is unsurprising that the ethnic Indians found themselves having to stand up and be counted. They really have nothing else to lose.

Some will argue that I can afford to spend time on politics today because I’ve made some money after having sold my company. Gana, despite having just started his own fledgling law firm, found himself frequently travelling (at least weekly) between his hometown Teluk Intan and his residence in Shah Alam to provide services to the needy and unfortunate. He even financed the rental and refurbishment of a service centre in Teluk Intan to carry out his services.

When I received cases at my own service centre in Damansara Utama and was in need of legal services to assist the complainants, Gana offered his services with no hesitation. For example, there was a group of seven contractors who failed to receive payment from a housing developer. Gana took up their case and offered legal advice pro bono. When legal action was required, I had to convince him to accept some payment from these contractors! Guess what? These contractors were all Chinese, but race never ever came into the picture, as should be the case for all right-thinking Malaysians.

Gana, the youngest of three brothers, is a son that would have made any family proud. He belongs to the Indian Telugu community and grew up in a poor family that made just enough to survive. Gana never had the privilege of completing his education at one go. After finishing Form 5, he had to take up various odd jobs to help support himself and his family.

However, that did not prevent him from investing his earnings and taking part-time courses to pursue his ambition of becoming an officer of the court. His dream came true in his late 20s when he graduated with a law degree from the University of London’s external programme.

He plied his trade as a legal assistant with a law firm in Teluk Intan before saving sufficiently to set up his own firm, having moved to Shah Alam late last year. But all these while, he held political ambitions, not to further enrich himself by illegal and unethical means but ambitions to play a part in the betterment of his marginalised community and of Malaysians in general. Having set up his own firm, he had, for better or worse, the flexibility to spend time on social and political causes. He did it with all his heart and soul.

Not too long ago, Gana got married to a school teacher. His first-born came on Merdeka day this year. His baby daughter is barely four months old and if Pak Lah has his way, by the time Gana is released from ISA detention, his daughter would be more than two years old. When Gana first pointed out his wife to me, she was sitting in the stands where he was being charged with sedition in the Klang sessions court. You could see tears in her eyes. Her fears have unfortunately come true.

Gana told me that his wife was a former Tamil school debater and is very politically- aware. In fact, she used to tease that he only knew how to “talk” politics but never got his hands dirty. More recently however, she would half-jokingly tell him that she regretted having ever encouraged him to join the fight for a just cause.

Gana is a good man. He has sacrificed selflessly to help create a better Malaysia for all Malaysians, particularly for the underprivileged and marginalised community. He quickly rose to prominence through sheer tenacity, hardwork, eloquence and dedication to the cause. About 30,000 Indians from all parts of Malaysia walked the streets of Kuala Lumpur not because they had nothing better to do, but because they shared his cause. They believed that enough is enough!

Pak Lah who is clearly unable to hear, accept and deal with the truth has invoked the draconian ISA in hopes of sweeping everything under the carpet. Thankfully, Gana has kind and loving family members who will help take care of his wife and child. DAP, as announced by the party secretary-general, will be setting up a fund to assist the families of those who have been detained without trial.

My eyes were moist as I wrote this letter. I firmly believe that Gana will be a stronger man post-detention. You would not have heard the last of him for a long time yet. I expect him to be a future leader of this country, a rare breed of the much needed righteous, caring, intelligent and dedicated kind who will contribute immensely to creating a better Malaysia for our future generations. His personal sacrifices must not and will not be in vain.